Quantcast

East Central Alabama News

Friday, September 20, 2024

Rep. Banks criticizes Army's extremism policies in congressional hearing

Webp fxmdzdkd9ipjyc92nln3sc5kcwcw

Mike Rogers - Chairman of the Armed Services Committee | Official U.S. House headshot

Mike Rogers - Chairman of the Armed Services Committee | Official U.S. House headshot

U.S. Representative Jim Banks (R-IN), Chairman of the Subcommittee on Military Personnel, delivered opening remarks at a hearing on extremism policies in the U.S. Army. The hearing follows a controversial training session at Ft. Liberty that mischaracterized pro-life organizations as terrorist groups.

Banks began by emphasizing the importance of freedom of speech, describing it as a foundational concern of American democracy. He criticized the Department of Defense and the U.S. Army for their extremism policies and training programs, which he believes undermine this fundamental right.

"This hearing will specifically address an anti-terrorism training, given for years to countless young service members at Fort Liberty that characterized pro-life organizations as 'terrorist groups,'" Banks stated. He highlighted that the training labeled several prominent pro-life groups as violent extremists and suggested that symbols associated with these groups, such as state-issued pro-life license plates, were indicators of terrorism.

Banks expressed concern over Army Directive 2024-07 (Handling Protest, Extremist, and Criminal Gang Activities), which he argues uses an overly broad policy to police conservative speech among service members. "The Army is using an overly broad policy to police the speech of conservative service members, quiet dissent, and require service members who believe in conservative ideals to hide their identities for fear of retaliation from their commands," he said.

He warned that such policies could be weaponized against any soldier with differing values from those of the administration. "That is why our oversight of these trainings and policies is so urgent," Banks concluded. "The First Amendment is broad for a reason; once speech is limited, no matter how offensive or vulgar, individual freedoms are dangerously infringed upon."

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY

!RECEIVE ALERTS

The next time we write about any of these orgs, we’ll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.
Sign-up

DONATE

Help support the Metric Media Foundation's mission to restore community based news.
Donate

MORE NEWS